home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0236>
- <title>
- Feb. 04, 1991: Rival Capitals Of Fantasy
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Feb. 04, 1991 Stalking Saddam
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BOOKS, Page 66
- Rival Capitals of Fantasy
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Richard Stengel
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>THE POWER AND THE GLITTER</l>
- <l>by Ronald Brownstein</l>
- <l>Pantheon; 437 pages; $24.95</l>
- </qt>
- <p> Katharine Hepburn once remarked that the secret to Fred
- Astaire and Ginger Rogers' success was that he gave her class
- while she gave him sex appeal. Hepburn's equation helps explain
- the long and awkward tango between Hollywood and Washington.
- To Washington, Hollywood offered glamour; to Hollywood,
- Washington provided substance, or at least the illusion of it.
- </p>
- <p> The two cities are the source of much American mythology.
- Washington promulgated the fable that any boy--or girl--could grow up to be President; Hollywood invented the fantasy
- that the same boy or girl could become a movie star. Both
- cities must appeal to hearts and minds; both require a mass
- audience; both thrive on applause.
- </p>
- <p> Ronald Brownstein's The Power and the Glitter is a history
- of the relationship between Hollywood and Washington. But
- Brownstein does not really mine the mythological and
- sociological bond between the two cities. Instead, he recounts
- the times that Hollywood and Washington have intersected on
- affairs of state and of the heart. His research suggests that
- while Washington occasionally flirts with Hollywood, Hollywood
- has long been an unrequited suitor in the corridors of power.
- In the end Brownstein's book is less a history of the connection
- between Washington politics and Hollywood dazzle than a
- diligent and readable survey of politics in Hollywood.
- </p>
- <p> Brownstein walks us through some of the early history:
- moguls sycophantically pursuing Presidents; Bogie and Bacall
- barnstorming for Adlai Stevenson; the Hollywood Ten and the
- House Committee on Un-American Activities; the unholy Jack Pack
- of Frank Sinatra and J.F.K. (Gary Hart and Warren Beatty being
- the more cerebral, 1980s version). Much of the book's second
- half deals with the travails of a coterie of wealthy Hollywood
- liberals--from Norman Lear to Rob Lowe--who are desperate
- to be taken seriously.
- </p>
- <p> In truth Washington is interested in Hollywood just at
- election times, and even then the interest is primarily cash.
- Only in the past few years has Hollywood demanded a little
- respect for its money. Liberal organizations such as the
- Hollywood Women's Political Committee and People for the
- American Way seek to influence policy, not just pose for
- snapshots with the candidate.
- </p>
- <p> Such ideological activism poses a Democratic dilemma. Groups
- like the H.W.P.C. are liberal on social and foreign policy
- issues but moderate on economic ones. Mainstream Democrats are
- precisely the opposite: they care far more about economic
- equity than about a nuclear freeze.
- </p>
- <p> No one disputes that the distance between politics and show
- business is narrowing, yet Hollywood is no closer to power.
- Ronald Reagan did not represent the apotheosis of Hollywood in
- Washington, but the reverse: he was spurned by the film
- community and accepted by voters precisely because he seemed
- so un-Hollywood. Washington has yet to harness Hollywood for
- its ability to create modern myths and tap into the national
- zeitgeist. When that happens, the connection between the two
- cities will be more real than celluloid.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-